Permitting

Permitting Reform is a bipartisan issue

Permitting Reform is a bipartisan issue

from Packy McCormick
Government efficiency should not be a partisan issue. Republican or Democrat, you should want your government to work both harder and smarter for you, for your tax dollars to go a bit further, and for there to be less unnecessary red tape.

We’re excited about what DOGE is going to do on this front. If DOGE can make efficiency a winning political value proposition, then you are going to see leaders from both sides of the aisle adopt it. Democratic Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro is already starting. Shapiro has been on the efficiency train since before it was cool — his record-breaking 1-95 reconstruction put him on the map.

Efficiency should not be the end goal here. Ultimately, we’ll want not just an efficient government but an effective one, too. Let’s Make Government Efficient Again! And I say that in the least partisan way possible.

Solar balconies are the equivalent of puppy pictures
|

Solar balconies are the equivalent of puppy pictures

Editor’s Note: Bill McKibbin’s newsletter today reports on a trend in Europe — to add standalone solar panels on your balcony and simply plug it into your house, no electrician needed.  It costs about $500 and pays for itself in reduced electricity bills quickly.  And yet, it’s not really available in the US, because “installing solar in the U.S. requires complying with an insane welter of state and local regulations. This is a huge problem for rooftop solar—it costs about $3.50 a watt to put up a system in America, compared with under a dollar in Australia or most of Europe, simply because of the paperwork and permitting.”

Is this another opportunity for bipartisan permitting reform?

Geothermal exploring accelerated by new House bill
|

Geothermal exploring accelerated by new House bill

News flash:  H.R. 6474,  a bill  to amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expedite geothermal exploration and development in previously studied or developed areas, passed the House yesterday by voice vote.  It now goes to the Senate for action.

NV-03 Representative Susie Lee originally co-sponsored the bill with R. Michelle Steel from California.  See https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6474/all-actions for legislative details.  Basically, this bill extends the same “categorical exclusions” to environmental impact requirements that are available for oil and gas exploration to geothermal exploration.  It’s no secret that Nevada sits on top of some significant geothermal resources. It now goes to the Senate for action.

Case study of a NEPA case causing unnecessary costs and deaths

Case study of a NEPA case causing unnecessary costs and deaths

EcoTech Note:  One public policy supporting the clean energy transition is “permitting reform.”  This case study highlights a project begun in 2011 which was the subject of significant cost/delay owing to litigation under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA).  The litigation did not change the outcome but drove the cost up to $435 million, nearly 3 times the original estimate.  And ratepayers have to foot the bill.

Note also that there is a real Environmental Justice price paid, too.  The Clean Air Task Force estimated the new CleanTech would avoid 1,400 asthma attacks and 83 deaths per year, caused by the old coal plants being replaced.  The NEPA delays therefore caused unnecessary deaths and disease.

 – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Op-Ed: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is our best shot at advancing critical climate goals

Op-Ed: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is our best shot at advancing critical climate goals

It would be a crucial step toward America realizing its potential as a clean energy superpower, but only if we can put our desires for a perfect policy aside and embrace practical compromise.

America has already begun to feel the impacts of landmark legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act and the bipartisan infrastructure law. But how transformative these legislative achievements can be for American reindustrialization, our transition to a clean energy economy, and job growth rests on some key decisions still before Congress.

One bill with the power to make a remarkable difference is the bipartisan Energy Permitting Reform Act (EPRA) of 2024, which will come to the floor once the House and the Senate return in the fall.

Introduced in July by Senators Joe Manchin, I-W.Va., and John Barrasso, R-Wyo., EPRA would be a crucial step toward America realizing its potential as a 21st century clean energy superpower, but only if…

What are the Emissions Impacts of The Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024?

What are the Emissions Impacts of The Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024?

EcoTech Note:  The most important federal lobbying opportunity is to press for passage of the Manchin-Barrasso bill — The Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 — in the lame duck session of this Congress.

Third Way has integrated the quantitative analyses of several thinktanks re: the NET effect on greenhouse gas emissions.  The result?  Estimates show that, worst case, the net reductions in GHGs is about 1% … with the best case scenario showing nearly a 17% reduction in GHG emissions. See also, Nerd Corner discussion.


Measuring the overall emissions impacts of EPRA requires assessing multiple provisions within the bill, including those that could have upward or downward pressure on emissions. While modeling the prescriptive impacts of the bill is challenging, the direction and magnitude of impacts is clear. The chart below places these provisions in scene together, presenting the banded range in which potential emissions impacts could fall.

Germany shows how permitting reform works
|

Germany shows how permitting reform works

EcoTech Note:  Here’s a mangled meme — “Necessity is a mother.” Germany faced an energy crisis after the Russia-Ukraine war interrupted their supply of natural gas. Needing more energy, fast, they reformed their permitting process … and, predictably, clean energy supplies poured onto their grid.

In the Fall, we in the US have a similar opportunity. See Big News: Bipartisan Permitting Reform Legislation Is Moving!

Talk to renewable-energy executives for long enough and almost everyone will complain about the time it takes to get government permits to build their power plants. Unless you’re operating in Germany these days.

“We’re quite pleased,” said Karsten Brüggemann, vice president of Nordex, which manufactures wind turbines. Particularly since 2022, he said, Nordex has seen a rapid rise in the number of turbines deployed and future wind farms permitted.

Big News:  Bipartisan Permitting Reform Legislation Is Moving!

Big News: Bipartisan Permitting Reform Legislation Is Moving!

Co-sponsored by the top two leaders in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 was introduced on Monday and has already garnered support from CCL, clean energy groups, public interest groups, and trade groups representing the fossil fuel industry.  Some groups, like the Center for Biological Diversity and Earth Justice are solidly against the Act, and the Sierra Club says it falls short of their standards to get their support (yet?).

This post reports on the legislative timelines, links to statements from the various interest groups and summaries of the Act itself.

CCL concludes: “It’s a really good bill!”

Renewable Development Faces Regulatory Tangle

Renewable Development Faces Regulatory Tangle

(from RTO Insider)
Reports Detail Growing List of State and Local Restrictions

Two new reports have been published on the profusion of local and state regulations affecting renewable energy development — one attempting to summarize them, the other quantifying the growing number of restrictions they impose. 

“Laws in Order: An Inventory of State Renewable Energy Siting Policies” summarizes the renewable energy siting and permitting policies in the 50 states and Puerto Rico. One of its findings is that the approach …

Why aren’t 100s of approved projects online?
|

Why aren’t 100s of approved projects online?

… “Construction is expected to begin this summer and be completed by the end of 2024,” reported the Wisconsin Rapids Tribune in April 2023.

But construction never began. And this March, the project’s developer asked regulators to give it an extension on its deadline to start building the solar farm. The company cited “delays in the interconnection study process,” setbacks in reaching an agreement to connect to the regional power grid and a three-year waiting period to receive critical pieces of equipment due to supply chain issues.

Minnesota joins Wisconsin to allow power lines alongside highways

Minnesota joins Wisconsin to allow power lines alongside highways

Here are two key facts about transmission lines: The U.S. needs a lot more of them to transition away from fossil fuels; they’re also incredibly difficult to build.

The challenge is negotiating permits for the power lines — which cross hundreds of miles — from the numerous jurisdictions and hundreds of private landowners along the planned route. This is a very slow process — too slow at its current pace for the U.S. to build enough power lines to meet its climate goals.

For the past half decade, bipartisan groups have been pushing federal and state lawmakers and transportation agencies to clear the way for a potential shortcut: siting power lines alongside highways….