Could a Carbon Tax Save the Build Back Better Agenda?
The virtues of effective reduction of GHGs at low cost give flexibility in budget negotiations around climate provisions.
The virtues of effective reduction of GHGs at low cost give flexibility in budget negotiations around climate provisions.
Good summary about carbon taxes in European countries, what the right prices should be and why “it’s harder to go from $0 to $35 than from $35 to $135 per ton.”
NY Times reports that Senate Majority Leader Schumer has directed Sen. Ron Wyden, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, to craft legislation placing a price on carbon emissions.
” … could help the United States halve emissions–-but without a carbon price or other substantial climate policies, reductions fall short.”
A new paper from the Niskanen Center explains why “carbon pricing” is a better way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than traditional emission control regulations.
* 128 investment groups with $43 TRILLION in assets have committed to net-zero-by-2050 / 1.5oC max warming.
* Harvard divests from fossil fuels companies.
* Janet Yellen may regulate lending to fossil fuel companies.
* “ESG” disclosures may be mandated by the SEC.
The centerpiece of climate action in Reconciliation, the CEPP, appears to be in trouble. Is carbon pricing more palatable? Can we tip Congress in our direction NOW?
It’s time to get our EXECUTIVE leaders to lean on Congress/Senator Cortez Masto to include carbon pricing in the Reconciliation — federally and at the state leval.
How shall we respond to the leak that the Senate Finance Committee is considering carbon pricing? Danny briefs us on the politics of the moment.