Carbon Removal machine

Is “Carbon Removal” tech viable yet?

Note: We know that getting to net zero GHG emissions by 2050 requires transitioning the grid to 100% clean energy and then electrifying everything else: EVs for transport; heat pumps for building HVAC; etc. Hard-to-abate sectors (like air travel!!) will still create GHGs. Trees, oceans and other “carbon sinks” will remove some CO2 naturally. Can tech remove more? Here’s a state-of-the-art summary.

CCL applauds inclusion of Growing Climate Solutions Act in omnibus

CCL applauds inclusion of Growing Climate Solutions Act in omnibus

CCLapplauds the inclusion of the Growing Climate Solutions Act in the omnibus spending bill expected to be passed this week. The legislation would help all farmers and foresters to access verified carbon credit markets and get paid for using climate-friendly practices that sequester carbon.

High tension, long distance electricity transmission lines

America’s Clean Energy Transition Needs Permitting Reform

While the clean energy transition appears unstoppable, the speed with which it occurs is uncertain. Fully implementing the IRA is key to transitioning fast enough. But fully realizing the IRA’s benefits takes too long. And sometimes, it’s impossible. That is, unless we overcome local permitting barriers.

Hempcrete Can Help Reduce GHGs
|

Hempcrete Can Help Reduce GHGs

Here is a two-fer: process fast-growing hemp into a building material with great thermal insulating qualities. 1) The hemp is a carbon sink, and 2) the insulation cuts down energy needed to heat/cool the building. The remaining question: cost? And can it come down to compete with alternatives like concrete? (Can “green premium” –> zero or negative?)